Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
with profile Open Computing Information Security Profile for OpenShift NodeThis baseline was inspired by the Center for Internet Security (CIS) Kubernetes Benchmark, v1.2.0 - 01-31-2017. For the ComplianceAsCode project to remain in compliance with CIS' terms and conditions, specifically Restrictions(8), note there is no representation or claim that the OpenCIS profile will ensure a system is in compliance or consistency with the CIS baseline.
The ComplianceAsCode Project
https://www.open-scap.org/security-policies/scap-security-guide
https://www.open-scap.org/security-policies/scap-security-guide
This guide presents a catalog of security-relevant
configuration settings for Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4. It is a rendering of
content structured in the eXtensible Configuration Checklist Description Format (XCCDF)
in order to support security automation. The SCAP content is
is available in the
Providing system administrators with such guidance informs them how to securely configure systems under their control in a variety of network roles. Policy makers and baseline creators can use this catalog of settings, with its associated references to higher-level security control catalogs, in order to assist them in security baseline creation. This guide is a catalog, not a checklist, and satisfaction of every item is not likely to be possible or sensible in many operational scenarios. However, the XCCDF format enables granular selection and adjustment of settings, and their association with OVAL and OCIL content provides an automated checking capability. Transformations of this document, and its associated automated checking content, are capable of providing baselines that meet a diverse set of policy objectives. Some example XCCDF Profiles, which are selections of items that form checklists and can be used as baselines, are available with this guide. They can be processed, in an automated fashion, with tools that support the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP). The NIST National Checklist Program (NCP), which provides required settings for the United States Government, is one example of a baseline created from this guidance.
scap-security-guide
package which is developed at
https://www.open-scap.org/security-policies/scap-security-guide.
Providing system administrators with such guidance informs them how to securely configure systems under their control in a variety of network roles. Policy makers and baseline creators can use this catalog of settings, with its associated references to higher-level security control catalogs, in order to assist them in security baseline creation. This guide is a catalog, not a checklist, and satisfaction of every item is not likely to be possible or sensible in many operational scenarios. However, the XCCDF format enables granular selection and adjustment of settings, and their association with OVAL and OCIL content provides an automated checking capability. Transformations of this document, and its associated automated checking content, are capable of providing baselines that meet a diverse set of policy objectives. Some example XCCDF Profiles, which are selections of items that form checklists and can be used as baselines, are available with this guide. They can be processed, in an automated fashion, with tools that support the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP). The NIST National Checklist Program (NCP), which provides required settings for the United States Government, is one example of a baseline created from this guidance.
Do not attempt to implement any of the settings in
this guide without first testing them in a non-operational environment. The
creators of this guidance assume no responsibility whatsoever for its use by
other parties, and makes no guarantees, expressed or implied, about its
quality, reliability, or any other characteristic.
Profile Information
Profile Title | Open Computing Information Security Profile for OpenShift Node |
---|---|
Profile ID | xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_profile_opencis-node |
CPE Platforms
- cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_container_platform:4.1
Revision History
Current version: 0.1.49
- draft (as of 2023-06-30)
Table of Contents
Checklist
Group Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 Group contains 3 groups and 1 rule | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Group OpenShift Settings Group contains 2 groups and 1 rule | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ref]
Each section of this configuration guide includes information about the default configuration
of an OpenShift cluster and a set of recommendations for hardening the configuration. For each
hardening recommendation, information on how to implement the control and/or how to verify or audit
the control is provided. In some cases, remediation information is also provided.
Many of the settings in the hardening guide are in place by default. The audit information for these
settings is provided in order to verify that the cluster admininstrator has not made changes that
would be less secure than the OpenShift defaults. A small number of items require configuration.
Finally, there are some recommendations that require decisions by the system operator, such as audit
log size, retention, and related settings. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Group Permissions Group contains 1 group and 1 rule | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ref]
Traditional security relies heavily on file and
directory permissions to prevent unauthorized users from reading or
modifying files to which they should not have access. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Group Verify Permissions on Important Files and Directories Group contains 1 rule | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[ref]
Permissions for many files on a system must be set
restrictively to ensure sensitive information is properly protected.
This section discusses important
permission restrictions which can be verified
to ensure that no harmful discrepancies have
arisen. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Red Hat and Red Hat Enterprise Linux are either registered
trademarks or trademarks of Red Hat, Inc. in the United States and other
countries. All other names are registered trademarks or trademarks of their
respective companies.